tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23140411.post9129187882280664248..comments2024-03-28T21:41:57.264-05:00Comments on Pacifist Viking: Blizzard: bloggenshaultPacifist Vikinghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16630996018868040440noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23140411.post-75634943191542658202007-08-10T13:48:00.000-05:002007-08-10T13:48:00.000-05:00And it continues... Nice work PV. I'm sure the su...And it continues... Nice work PV. I'm sure the subterfuge worked. <BR/><BR/>2007 Artose Pinner update - Vikings all time single season leading rusher. Taylor and Peterson go down with minor injuries (Peterson will catch a slight but unshakable case of death) and Pinner will respond with a 1,900 yard, 19 td season. This is the year!<BR/><BR/>AOAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23140411.post-62706008166529381112007-08-10T13:10:00.000-05:002007-08-10T13:10:00.000-05:00Lamont Jordan? He struggled behind a bad line las...Lamont Jordan? He struggled behind a bad line last year, but I think they're improved, and I expect big things from him in '07.<BR/><BR/>Tomlinson, of course, will flourish under new coach Norv Turner. He'll be better than last year.Pacifist Vikinghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16630996018868040440noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23140411.post-75571463194316340212007-08-10T13:06:00.000-05:002007-08-10T13:06:00.000-05:00I never understood why people thought Lamont Jorda...I never understood why people thought Lamont Jordan was going to be a viable option. I provide the following evidence: 1) It's the Raiders and 2) it's Lamont Jordan. Officially the "M" in his name isn't capitolized on account of he sucks and doesn't deserve it. <BR/><BR/>Side note --> Lamont or "La Mont" in french (and possibly in spanish, too) means "the Mont." Wikipedia tells me that the Mont was a fictional hero of the Basque area of France/Spain that came to lead the rebellion and gain independence. He gave firey speeches and told tales of bravery, but ultimately couldn't lead men or stratagize at all, and his forces were whiped out and he captured in a rebellion in 1822. <BR/><BR/>Who knew? Moma Jordan, that's who.<BR/><BR/>Anon #1Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23140411.post-70974063619798611862007-08-10T12:39:00.000-05:002007-08-10T12:39:00.000-05:00nice reasoning Anon #1, to bad we only have 16 ros...nice reasoning Anon #1, to bad we only have 16 roster spots. so you actually have 254/5 almost $51 per player.<BR/><BR/>2003 ChampAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23140411.post-33921518885510292182007-08-10T10:41:00.000-05:002007-08-10T10:41:00.000-05:00That strategy only works if you hit on every. sing...That strategy only works if you hit on every. single. one. of your picks. Last year, I thought LaMont Jordan was going to be a top 10 fantasy back. That's one reason I'm not the three time champ, just the only back-to-back champ. That and LaDanian Tomlinson.<BR/><BR/>KSAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23140411.post-68580382010178484342007-08-10T10:17:00.000-05:002007-08-10T10:17:00.000-05:00Here is what I have reasoned out: There are 5 sta...Here is what I have reasoned out: There are 5 starters that I feel I need that I won't be able to get for 1 dollar and won't be able to pick up in free angency. The QB, the WRs and the RBs. If we have 265 and 17 roster spots, then subtracting the 5 positions critical to scoring leaves me with 12 positions. 265 - 12 = 253. 253/5 leaves me with around 50 bucks to spend on each of those positions. If one of my guys goes over 100, then I'll have to take it out of the other starters money and end up with a putz of somekind in a critical starter role.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com